If it was about making me happy, I'd make no argument. I'm concerned with putting feelings over rationality and jacking up morality forever. https://t.co/Xf17OCz7qu— Mike Partyka (@MichaelJPartyka) October 2, 2017
Have we fully grasp how the world should be? We learn from our feelings.https://t.co/6yn7KVBl6l— Ébídàghè (@ebidaghe) October 2, 2017
We have pains; if we ignore them solely for morality, what will we be then?— Ébídàghè (@ebidaghe) October 2, 2017
We need a balance
True. For our feelings are within the bounds of morality when moral construct isn't sham.— Ébídàghè (@ebidaghe) October 2, 2017
Correction: Our feelings are within the bounds of morality when our feelings aren't corrupt. https://t.co/AFinP0d59m— Mike Partyka (@MichaelJPartyka) October 3, 2017
Only if you have discarded the objective standard of morality making what's wrong with the world right. Once you do that, anything goes.— Mike Partyka (@MichaelJPartyka) October 3, 2017
Feelings can be corrupt; reasoning can be shallow. Both weave morality.https://t.co/fegLpRyMDO— Ébídàghè (@ebidaghe) October 3, 2017
*Tilting— Ébídàghè (@ebidaghe) October 3, 2017
Women in burqas, married into polygamy, constrained is morality - averting chaos yet not
Women married into polygamy - everyone has a husband, none is deprived of sexual (bio) function.— Ébídàghè (@ebidaghe) October 3, 2017
Women constrained - the weaker under the stronger, feelings not regarded, 'home front' defended.— Ébídàghè (@ebidaghe) October 3, 2017
If morality can be recreated to serve our needs, then there's no such thing as morality, just rationalizations of whatever behavior we like. https://t.co/YCJFehcJQX— Mike Partyka (@MichaelJPartyka) October 3, 2017